The Grammarian is supposed to be one of the objective evaluation roles. The tasks are:
At the Munich Toastmasters we don't use the "Word of the Day" so my role was just to watch the "good use of grammar and language". Being a non-native speaker and having a subjective view on what is "good use" made it a very subjective type of objective evaluation in the end.
The Grammarian selects a "Word for the Day". It should be a word that can be incorporated easily into everyday conversation but is different from the way people usually express themselves.
During the meeting announce the "Word of the Day", state its part of speech, define it, use it in a sentence, and ask that anyone speaking during any part of the meeting use it.
During the meeting the Grammarian listens to everyone's word usage and writes down any awkward use or misuse of the language (incomplete sentences, sentences that change direction in midstream, incorrect grammar, malapropisms, etc.) with a note of who erred. Write down who used the "Word of the Day" (or derivative of it) and note those who used it correctly or incorrectly.
The Grammarians report trys (sic!) to offer the correct usage in every instance where there was misuse instead of only explaining what was wrong. The Grammarian also reports on creative language usage and announce who used the "Word of the Day".
(Taken from http://www.umanitoba.ca/ ... /roles.html)
For the most part I mentioned phrases that caught my ear. Like
- cradle to grave
- the spirit lifts itself upon words
- embrace a word
- a positive negative
- need for greed
- the very pinacle of human achievment
- a present and a privilege
- all good things come in three
Since this is Toastmasters everone can do the Grammarian and grow in this role from time to time. Even a non-native speaker. In every evaluating role you improve your listening skills. This is a role I will have to do for the Leadership handbook. But then I will be better prepared, e.g. bring Murphy's English Grammar in Use with me and try to better structure my report.
Once again I had problems with my breathing: In order to have a steady pacing I tried to speak without breathing in too deeply. This only led to a hot head and finally made me breathless.
- Time: 3:32 (too long)
- Start standing than move around (this creates more dynamism than the other way around)
- leaning forward is stronger than leaning back
- instead of only providing information, make them think themselves (e.g. by asking questions and using rhetorical devices)
- in a Q&A session the speaker always repeats the question before answering it